Blackstone's Jon Gray Addresses 700+ Clients | May 2026
Jon Gray (President & COO, Blackstone) addressing 700+ LPs across a firm of **270 portfolio companies and 13,000 real estate assets** — the most direct private-markets read in this week's cohort, and the one that matters most to a CRE desk. The throughline: the AI-infrastructure buildout is **'the best risk adjusted way for us to play it'**, and the scarcity is now on the supply side, not the capital side. Gray sizes the wave hard: *'$800 billion is going to be spent by five companies'*; Blackstone alone expects to sign **6 gigawatts of data-centre leasing this year — '6 gigawatts is $100 billion of data centers. Another 200 billion of chips that the hyperscalers will put in. $300 billion is the size of the Finland economy.'** Against the bubble worry he inverts it: *'everybody talks about is there overbuilding... I would argue today the opposite is the risk'* — the binding constraints are *'the shortage of power, the shortage of turbines, the shortage of memory chips and the almost exponential growth in demand'*, which is the same multi-year memory/power shortage [Cerebras and the memory cohort flagged last week](/issues/2026-05-31). **The CRE-specific call:** real estate *'is going to really get a tailwind here'* after four years as *'one of the least bubbly parts of the economy'*, with **logistics his favourite part of the ecosystem** and debt costs falling into a supply-starved development pipeline. The honest counterweight is **software**: a *'resetting of multiples lower'* is now *'a fact of life'* — he wouldn't underwrite *'the 20 times multiples that existed 12 months ago'*, took **significant Q1 markdowns on growth-equity software (6.5% of the firm)**, and — pointed, for Jack — flagged *'what is a billable hour at a law firm going to be? I'm not sure.'* On exits he stands by **2026 as 'the year of the IPO'**, betting two of SpaceX / Anthropic / OpenAI list this year. On credit he defends private credit as structurally *less* levered than the bank-to-CLO chain it replaces and tips **investment-grade AI-infrastructure financing as the 'most explosive growth' ahead.** Net: a builder of the picks-and-shovels layer telling his own clients where the scarcity rents — and the disruption losses — will land.
Key points
- **The buildout, sized: '$800 billion is going to be spent by five companies' — and Blackstone alone is signing 6GW this year.** *'With our leasing in data centers, we think this year we'll sign 6 gigawatts. 6 gigawatts is $100 billion of data centers. Another 200 billion of chips that the hyperscalers will put in. $300 billion is the size of the Finland economy.'* This is the operator-side number behind the abstractions — the firm physically leasing the data centres puts a country-sized GDP figure on a single year's pipeline, and frames the whole digest's capex debate from the landlord's chair, not the chip-maker's.
- **The bubble call, inverted: the risk is shortage, not overbuild.** *'Everybody talks about is there overbuilding? That's a big risk... I would argue today the opposite is the risk that the political pushback which is growing, that the shortage of power, the shortage of turbines, the shortage of memory chips and the almost exponential growth in demand means these data centers, once you get them built, are going to be incredibly valuable.'* This is the buy-and-build confirmation of [the Cerebras CEO's 'building behind demand' thesis and the multi-year memory shortage from Issue 07](/issues/2026-05-31) — same conclusion, reached from leasing data rather than backlog data.
- **The CRE tailwind — the most load-bearing line for a real-estate desk.** *'I think real estate is going to really get a tailwind here. As people look for terra firma... There's been this sharp decline in new building, debt costs have come down and then I think capital will begin to rediscover this area. It has certainly been a laggard for the last four years. One of the least bubbly parts of the economy.'* And the sub-call: *'Logistics is my favorite part of the real estate ecosystem.'* The mechanism is classic: a four-year supply drought plus falling debt costs sets up the next leg — the cleanest directly-actionable read in the issue for a CRE investor.
- **The data-centre asset class has 'no natural home' yet — so Blackstone built one (BXDC).** *'There are hundreds of billions of data centers being built. There are going to be trillions ultimately I think, and yet there's no natural home for them today. These are great long term assets... they're leased to the biggest companies in the world.'* Gray is describing a new institutional real-estate category being securitised in real time (BXDC just IPO'd) — read alongside [the Uber CEO's autonomous-vehicle thread this week](/issues/2026-06-07), since Gray names AV disruption to *'automotive repair and insurance'* as a parallel sectoral reset.
- **Software: 'a resetting of multiples lower... that's just a fact of life now.'** *'I wouldn't assume the 20 times multiples that existed 12 months ago for many of these businesses because they were seen as safe... We took pretty significant markdowns in the first quarter against our private equity growth equity holdings in software. Fortunately, as a firm it's six and a half percent of what we do overall.'* This is the private-market markdown that the public ROI-reckoning cohort has been circling — Gray quantifies the exposure (6.5%) and concedes the de-rating is structural, not cyclical. It pairs with [Mercor's 'application-layer has no defensibility' argument this week](/issues/2026-06-07).
- **The line aimed straight at Jack's profession: 'what is a billable hour at a law firm going to be? I'm not sure.'** *'If your model is based on per seat pricing, right, and you're no longer using seats, you're dealing with agents, you need a different business. By the way, it's not that different than what is a billable hour at a law firm going to be?'* Gray is generalising the per-seat-to-per-agent pricing break across all professional services — the same seat-pricing collapse the SaaS bears are modelling, applied explicitly to legal. A direct prompt to think about A&O's own billing model under agentic AI.
- **'The year of the IPO' call reaffirmed — two of the three private giants list in 2026.** *'You're helped by the fact that the three biggest private companies in the world are likely, probably two of them go public this year between SpaceX, Anthropic and OpenAI.'* Gray, who coined the 2026-IPO call, is holding it from the supply side — and it lines up with [the OpenAI CFO and Thomas Laffont's '$4T AI IPO wave' episodes this week](/issues/2026-06-07) and [the SpaceX/Anthropic/OpenAI ~$86B supply wave from Issue 07](/issues/2026-05-31). The hedge: only the *AI-uncertain* subset is hard to float; AI-unaffected names (fast food, medical supplies) clear fine.
- **Private credit defended as structurally LESS levered than the system it replaces — and IG-AI financing is the next leg.** *'The traditional system, and we're a huge CLO player too, is basically a 13 time levered bank, essentially sells through... to an 11 times leveraged CLO... this model has us use your capital and either do it on an unleveraged basis or often one times or lower leverage. That is not risk to the financial system.'* And the growth tip: *'where you're going to see the most explosive growth is on the investment grade side, particularly providing capital to this... AI infrastructure buildout.'* The investable read: the next financing wave isn't non-IG direct lending — it's investment-grade private capital funding the data-centre capex Gray sized above.
- **The honest 'fly in the ointment' — disruption hits professional and information services, not just software.** *'What is going to happen to lots of professional services businesses, information services businesses, software businesses? We remember what happened to the yellow pages 20 plus years ago. That's now going to happen in a whole range of industries.'* Gray's retail analogy is the nuance: Sears/Kmart/Toys R Us *'went the way of the dodo bird'* while Costco, Walmart and TJ Maxx compounded 7-40x — disruption sorts winners from losers within a sector, it doesn't flatten the sector. The bull-case counterweight to [Dwarkesh's 'the better AI gets, the smaller its economic share' thesis this week](/issues/2026-06-07).
- **The macro frame: ride out the crisis, then read the facts on the ground.** *'If you go back since 2020, almost every year started with a fairly significant crisis... And in each of those years we got through those crises... the markets went higher.'* On inflation, Gray claims the official data lags reality: *'we see shelter costs, rental housing costs running well below the government data, probably a third below the government's lag data'*, with wage growth cooling **5% to 3%**. The Middle East war is the live risk — *'if there is a resolution to the conflict, then my bet's going to look very good'* — the same oil/geopolitics variable [Dan Loeb made one of his two macro factors](/issues/2026-05-31).
Notable quotes
$800 billion is going to be spent by five companies. Daniel Gross is going to be up here responsible for the capex spend and infrastructure and Metta. That's an enormous amount of money. Little old Blackstone. With our leasing in data centers, we think this year we'll sign 6 gigawatts. 6 gigawatts is $100 billion of data centers. Another 200 billion of chips that the hyperscalers will put in. $300 billion is the size of the Finland economy.
now everybody talks about is there overbuilding? That's a big risk, Is there a lot of capital? I would argue today the opposite is the risk that the political pushback which is growing, that the shortage of power, the shortage of turbines, the shortage of memory chips and the almost exponential growth in demand means these data centers, once you get them built, are going to be incredibly valuable.
I think real estate is going to really get a tailwind here. As people look for terra firma, they're nervous about the disruption, they're nervous about dislocation. There's been this sharp decline in new building debt costs have come down and then I think capital will begin to rediscover this area. It has certainly been a laggard for the last four years. One of the least bubbly parts of the economy, I would say. Logistics is my favorite part of the real estate ecosystem.
What's the market hold there is that there are hundreds of billions of data centers being built. There are going to be trillions ultimately I think, and yet there's no natural home for them today. These are great long term assets. You know, they're leased to the biggest companies in the world.
But I wouldn't assume the 20 times multiples that existed 12 months ago for many of these businesses because they were seen as safe. Recurring revenues are going to persist even though on the ground today our portfolio companies are continuing to perform very well both in credit and in private equity. We all know it's going to be a more challenging time going forward. I think we have to accept lower multiples.
We took pretty significant markdowns in the first quarter against our private equity growth equity holdings in software. Fortunately, as a firm it's six and a half percent of what we do overall. Nevertheless, this is, this is real.
And if your model is based on per seat pricing, right, and you're no longer using seats, you're dealing with agents, you need a different business. By the way, it's not that different than what is a billable hour at a law firm going to be? I'm not sure.
the three biggest private companies in the world are likely, probably two of them go public this year between SpaceX, Anthropic and OpenAI. But more broadly, the market away from those AI impacted companies I think will still be pretty good.
the traditional system, and we're a huge CLO player too, is basically a 13 time levered bank, essentially sells through some holding and flipping whatever to an 11 times leveraged CLO. That's what it is. And this model has us use your capital and either do it on an unleveraged basis or often one times or lower leverage. That is not risk to the financial system.
I think where you're going to see the most explosive growth is on the investment grade side, particularly providing capital to this really, this revolution, this AI infrastructure buildout, because you need private capital, the flexibility, the structure to do the scale of what's coming and to do it in a way that's different than liquid markets for these huge development projects.
what is going to happen to lots of professional services businesses, information services businesses, software businesses? We remember what happened to the yellow pages 20 plus years ago. That's now going to happen in a whole range of industries.
Themes
- AI data-centre buildout (supply-side scarcity)
- Commercial real estate cycle turn
- Private credit & investment-grade AI financing
- Software multiple compression / professional-services disruption
- AI IPO supply wave
Mentioned
People
Ideas
- $800B AI capex by five companies
- 6GW / $100B data-centre leasing
- shortage not overbuild (power/turbines/memory)
- real estate as the least-bubbly tailwind
- logistics as favourite RE segment
- data centres as a new institutional asset class (BXDC)
- software multiple reset 20x -> lower
- per-seat to per-agent pricing break / the billable hour
- 2026 'year of the IPO'
- private credit less levered than bank-to-CLO chain
- investment-grade AI-infrastructure financing
- AI productivity boom vs sectoral disruption